首页> 外文OA文献 >Development and validation of the ACE tool: Assessing medical trainees\u27 competency in evidence based medicine
【2h】

Development and validation of the ACE tool: Assessing medical trainees\u27 competency in evidence based medicine

机译:ACE工具的开发和验证:评估医学实习生在循证医学中的能力

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: While a variety of instruments have been developed to assess knowledge and skills in evidence based medicine (EBM), few assess all aspects of EBM - including knowledge, skills attitudes and behaviour - or have been psychometrically evaluated. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an instrument that evaluates medical trainees\u27 competency in EBM across knowledge, skills and attitude. Methods. The \u27Assessing Competency in EBM\u27 (ACE) tool was developed by the authors, with content and face validity assessed by expert opinion. A cross-sectional sample of 342 medical trainees representing \u27novice\u27, \u27intermediate\u27 and \u27advanced\u27 EBM trainees were recruited to complete the ACE tool. Construct validity, item difficulty, internal reliability and item discrimination were analysed. Results: We recruited 98 EBM-novice, 108 EBM-intermediate and 136 EBM-advanced participants. A statistically significant difference in the total ACE score was observed and corresponded to the level of training: on a 0-15-point test, the mean ACE scores were 8.6 for EBM-novice; 9.5 for EBM-intermediate; and 10.4 for EBM-advanced (p \u3c 0.0001). Individual item discrimination was excellent (Item Discrimination Index ranging from 0.37 to 0.84), with internal reliability consistent across all but three items (Item Total Correlations were all positive ranging from 0.14 to 0.20). Conclusion: The 15-item ACE tool is a reliable and valid instrument to assess medical trainees\u27 competency in EBM. The ACE tool provides a novel assessment that measures user performance across the four main steps of EBM. To provide a complete suite of instruments to assess EBM competency across various patient scenarios, future refinement of the ACE instrument should include further scenarios across harm, diagnosis and prognosis.
机译:背景:尽管已经开发出多种工具来评估循证医学(EBM)的知识和技能,但很少评估EBM的各个方面-包括知识,技能态度和行为-或已通过心理计量学进行了评估。这项研究的目的是开发和验证一种工具,该工具可以评估知识,技能和态度方面的医学实习生在EBM中的能力。方法。作者开发了EBM \ u27评估能力(ACE)工具,并通过专家意见评估了内容和面部有效性。招募了342名医学培训人员的横截面样本,分别代表\ u27novice \ u27,\ u27intermediate \ u27和\ u27advanced \ u27 EBM培训生来完成ACE工具。分析了构建的有效性,项目难度,内部可靠性和项目歧视性。结果:我们招募了98名EBM新手,108名EBM中级和136名EBM高级参与者。观察到总ACE得分在统计学上有显着差异,并与训练水平相对应:在0-15点测试中,EBM-novice的平均ACE得分为8.6; 9.5对于EBM-中级;对于高级EBM,则为10.4(p \ u3c 0.0001)。单个物品的辨别力非常好(物品辨别指数范围从0.37到0.84),除三个物品外,其他所有物品的内部可靠性都保持一致(物品总相关系数均为正值,范围从0.14到0.20)。结论:15项ACE工具是一种可靠且有效的工具,可用来评估医学学员在EBM中的能力。 ACE工具提供了一种新颖的评估,可以评估EBM四个主要步骤中的用户表现。为了提供一套完整的工具来评估各种患者情况下的EBM能力,ACE工具的未来完善应包括危害,诊断和预后方面的其他情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号